Skip to content
MaterialsEstimator
Every tool

Groundwork and paving

Everything that gets poured, compacted or laid on the ground

Floors

Inside, from the subfloor up

Walls and ceilings

Board, paint and what goes behind them

Roof and exterior

The outside of the building and the water coming off it

Outdoor structures and landscape

Decks, fences and everything green

Sizing the systems

Heating, cooling and hot water

Framing and carpentry

Cut lists, layout and the code that constrains them

Measuring and costing

The tools that feed every other one

Appearance

How this is worked out

Reference data

Regional price index

The labour factor applied to estimates in each of the 51 states, and the federal series it comes from.

Pablo Ruiz Quintero, editor of MaterialsEstimator

Written and edited by Pablo Ruiz Quintero
Last reviewed 2026-09-16

How much more does construction labour cost in my state?

Ranked most expensive first. An index of 1.10 means the labour portion of an estimate is multiplied by 1.10 in that state; the material portion is not touched. A blank ZIP code gets 1.00, the national average.

StatePrice parityLabour indexVersus average
California110.71.107+10.7%
Hawaii110.01.100+10.0%
District of Columbia109.91.099+9.9%
New Jersey108.81.088+8.8%
New York107.91.079+7.9%
Washington107.01.070+7.0%
Massachusetts105.81.058+5.8%
Maryland105.01.050+5.0%
New Hampshire104.21.042+4.2%
Connecticut103.61.036+3.6%
Florida103.41.034+3.4%
Oregon103.41.034+3.4%
Colorado103.11.031+3.1%
Alaska102.41.024+2.4%
Rhode Island102.31.023+2.3%
Virginia101.11.011+1.1%
Arizona100.71.007+0.7%
Nevada100.01.000-0.0%
Illinois100.01.000-0.0%
Delaware99.80.998-0.2%
Utah98.90.989-1.1%
Minnesota98.60.986-1.4%
Vermont98.00.980-2.0%
Pennsylvania97.60.976-2.4%
Texas97.10.971-2.9%
Maine97.00.970-3.0%
Georgia96.30.963-3.7%
Michigan96.20.962-3.8%
Idaho95.50.955-4.5%
Montana94.60.946-5.4%
North Carolina94.30.943-5.7%
Wisconsin94.10.941-5.9%
South Carolina93.70.937-6.3%
Indiana93.30.933-6.7%
Ohio92.80.928-7.2%
Wyoming92.70.927-7.3%
New Mexico92.20.922-7.8%
Tennessee91.90.919-8.1%
Missouri90.80.908-9.2%
Kentucky90.20.902-9.8%
Nebraska90.10.901-9.9%
Kansas90.10.901-9.9%
West Virginia89.50.895-10.5%
North Dakota89.00.890-11.0%
Alabama88.80.888-11.2%
South Dakota88.60.886-11.4%
Louisiana88.20.882-11.8%
Oklahoma87.80.878-12.2%
Iowa87.80.878-12.2%
Mississippi87.00.870-13.0%
Arkansas86.90.869-13.1%
Applied to labour only. A bag of concrete mix does not cost eleven per cent more in California — the hour to place it does.

Why only labour

This is the single biggest difference between the prices here and the prices on most other calculator sites, and it is worth arguing about rather than taking on trust.

A bag of concrete mix is a manufactured good on a pallet. It costs roughly the same in Mississippi as in New Jersey, because it is made and shipped by the same companies to the same big-box chains. What genuinely differs by geography is the hour of a person’s work. Multiplying an entire estimate by one “local cost factor” inflates the material half by a number that mostly reflects the price of housing.

So the material and the labour are computed separately, and only the labour carries this index. Heavy and bulk materials get a freight sensitivity of their own instead, because what moves the delivered price of stone or ready-mix is the distance to the pit or the plant — not the state line.

Where the index comes from, and what is wrong with it

It is the federal Regional Price Parities series, which measures what a fixed basket of goods and services costs in each state against a national average of 100. It is published annually, it is free, and it is methodologically solid for what it is designed to do.

It is still a proxy, and we would rather say so than imply more precision than we have. The all-items parity is heavily influenced by rent, which correlates with construction wages but is not the same thing. The direct measure would be state-level construction occupation wages from the federal occupational survey. Moving to it is recorded as pending in the changelog; until it happens, this is an approximation doing an honest job, and the page it feeds says so too.

Reading the spread

The whole range runs from about 87 to about 111, which is a spread of roughly a quarter between the cheapest and most expensive states. On the labour half of a small job that is real money but rarely decisive; on a large one it is the difference between two quotes. Within a state the variation between a city and a rural county is often larger than the variation between states — no state-level index can capture that, and a calculator that claims to is guessing.

Send this to whoever is paying

The link carries your measurements, so whoever opens it sees the same numbers you are looking at — and you can come back to it yourself tomorrow with the delivery note in front of you.

Plain links, no tracking scripts. Nothing here reports back that you shared it.

Pablo Ruiz Quintero, editor of MaterialsEstimator

About the author

Pablo Ruiz QuinteroEditor

Editor of MaterialsEstimator. Decides which documents count as a source, what every default value is, and where the line sits between what the reader parses and what the engines compute.

More about how this site is edited